This Poem was Submitted By: James C. Horak On Date: 2008-11-22 10:38:45 . . . Click Here To Mail this Poem to a Friend!

To Listen to Music While Reading this Poem, just Click Here!

Click Here To add this poem to your "Voting Possibilities" list!


Terry's Latest Submission

Another critique lost to the poorly placed "evil" button and, which, will simply refuses to die... Excellent and original, you are beginning to define a style, something even Rachel lacked. The poem strikes at the basis of differences between prose and poetry and delivers its own "non sequitur" parallel of where poetry takes license prose cannot. Stringent thought versus the flight of the fanciful, wherein, so many times, discovery is made.  JCH

Copyright © November 2008 James C. Horak


This Poem was Critiqued By: Claire H. Currier On Date: 2008-12-05 17:00:26
Critiquer Rating During Critique: 10.00000
We have all hit that 'evil' button at one time or another yet here you are giving credit where credit is due. Nice to have you within the poets of the link......take good care and stay warm in the cold weather ahead. God Bless, Claire


This Poem was Critiqued By: Rene L Bennett On Date: 2008-11-26 02:08:05
Critiquer Rating During Critique: 10.00000
Well, you have me confused with this one...lol Poetry written in a critique. Awesome Rene'
This Poem was Critiqued By: Terry A On Date: 2008-11-22 12:15:52
Critiquer Rating During Critique: 1.00000
Thanks. The poem was lightweight, but sometimes is what so far I haven't been able to find any really informed information on the non-determinist movement in poetry; but I gather (and I gather simply by studying the words) it means open-ended, not completely defined, where effects may precede causes so there's a timeless quality simply not all summed up in a tidy little pkg. For the most part, I stopped reading others poetry, because imitation is too easy for me, so I read dictionaries...it brings me closer to the meaning of words and then I can write my own meanings using words more fully. Words become tokens placed in context instead of enclosed objects with strictly defined meanings. I will still read other poets but none of the published "old school Harold Bloom" ones for awhile. What poetry society didn't define itself newly? The title of my poem...I believe you understand fully beyond what is written here. "fanciful"? maybe, the world seems to need some of that. It's lightweight but doesn't drag down. Nothing has to be mundane...and poems especially don't have to ever be mundane, poetically speaking. Terry
Poetry Contests Online at The Poetic Link

Click HERE to return to ThePoeticLink.com Database Page!